Posts Tagged ‘Pakistan’

Culture of Corruption? -India,Pakistan,Bangladesh

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

Ricky pointing yesterday said in radio interview that he was shocked. Known as punter himself , he felt that allegation on pakistani team should be investigated to get to the root and he also suspected that it is culture of subcontinent. View which watson too subscribed too in more polite manner. Anil Kumble slammed this stating that it happened in west Indies , southafrica and even Australia . So it is global issue but not culture issue.

Anil has right to say what he said. For player who has played more than 17-18 years in upright way , he has right to slam anything like this but this culture thing needs little elaboration and should be taken in holistic view than just cricket.

When Jinnah came up with two nation theory ,he made up his case citing festivals,aspirations , role model , heros and such things. He argued that heros for Muslims are villains for Hindus and vice versa. He argued that there has always been two nations existing in India.

Jinnah had his way and pakistan was born. By definition word pakistan means ‘land of pure’. So land of pure was born with dream of providing land to subcontinent muslims.

Was pakistan dream bought by all muslims of subcontinent. Answer in no. Many stayed back in India while many moved to pakistan to live their life as per dream in which they were enrolled.

Now as 63 years have passed ,if we look back at all these years , amidst war between India and pakistan , issues like kashmir and terrorism , there are many things which are common in India and Pakistan,Bangladesh.

The number one thing which is common in all three is high level of corruption. Out of 163 countries surveyed , Bangladesh comes is 155 ranked , Pakistan is 134 ranked. India managed to improve its position and is now ranked 84th. So there are 83 more countries in the world which are less corrupted than India but that also means that India is highly corrupted.

Another thing common in Bangladesh , India and Pakistan is governance. While Pakistan and Bangladesh being small countries have often been bullied by army ,India has had democracy barring brief period of emergency . Still highlight of governance in all three countries is lack of accountability , divide and rule , fear based politics.

Since India is home to all religions , division in name of religion is easy. India being home of Hinduism , caste based politics is also easy and what caste,religion can’t do region can obviously do. When all fails , Pakistan’s name is good enough to get the job done.

Pakistan on other hand has 96% Muslims so religion based politics is not lucrative. But region based is. Taking hardline stand and blaming raw,mossad,cia aiming at only Muslim nuclear equipped country comes handy. Similar is story of Bangladesh.

Governance uses tool of corruption ,right from filling personal bank accounts to wooing voters.

When Jinnah called Muslims and Hindus as two different nation ,what he forgot was culture and common heritage. While all three countries share rich heritage and ancient civilizations , in same way it shares minus of that and one of the big minus point is corruption. In great history of Indian subcontinent , cases of betrayal,bribes in form of cash or post too makes its presence felt.We have role models of Ram ,harishchandra in India a stats says it all. Corruption has really become part of subcontinent lives and no matter how much we call ourselves different , we are more same than we think we are. We may call ourselves hindus or muslims but what binds us is common problem.

As scotland yard continues its investigation , it is time to look within and ask ourselves ‘do we have culture of corruption?’. The place which produced bhagat singh , chandrshekar azad , tilak , subash , even non corrupted jinnah and mahatma gandhi , the same place has deep rooted corruption in the sytem , in one’s life.

Lashkar-e-Taiba & Pakistan Flood Relief Camp

Saturday, August 28th, 2010

Call it plain irony . Pakistan faced worst floods since last 80 years and one of worst crisis since its independence. What geography could not do , what common history could not do , what similar culture could not do ,nature did. India humbly requested pakistan to accept aid from it which pakistan rightly did. The most unpopular country in pakistan ,that is USA was first to reach pakistan for assistance through nwfp border and usa collected around $200 million aid for pakistan. USA also sent its aid chief who co incidentally happens to be Indian-American , Mr Rajiv Shah!!!!!!!!!.

Mr rajiv shah’s pakistan calling was not spared from controversies. Rajiv shah reportely was threatened by extremist not because he has Indian link but because extremist have threatened all foreigners who came to assist pakistan in these terrible times!!!!!!!!. But what sparked controversy is Rajiv shah’s visit to a relief camp. Soon after his visit lashkar-e-taiba urf jamaat ud dawa claimed to dawn’s reporter that the camp is being run by them and so usa indirectly endorsed their activities!!!!!!!!

Rajiv shah and usa’s embassy in pakistan soon denied the claims and counter claimed that the camp was run by non other than united nations.

Lashkar e taiba’s camps are not new . They run terror camps 24 hours a day , 365 days an year but they also run relief camps during floods , earth quakes , run schools , assist poors and such stuffs. They love to run terror camps to kill Indians and run relief camps for branding in Pakistan. It works for them since they continue getting money as charitable trust , gain sympathy among people of Pakistan whom they serve and this helps them in running their killing system.

I dont have objection of lashkar e taiba having relief camps. If they get involved in charity activities for ever , I would be more than happy but running relief camps for needy and using guns to kill innocents at same time is something which doesnot make sense. But with extremist viewing world in narrow prism of we v/s they , human race is again not one unit.

As pakistan battles this calamity let us wish them well and hope lashkar expands its horizon and sheds its narrow view of world..

Jinnah , Pakistan Flood And Indian Aid

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

If you are part of Indian subcontinent or are aware of Indian history , you might have heard about muhammad ali jinnah.For those who have not heard about him , here is brief about muhammad ali jinnah.

Muhammad ali jinnah was one of the most successful lawyers of british India and was part of congress as well as muslim league . He joined congress in 1896 while muslim league in 1913. He was close associate of Gopal Krishna Gokhale, Pherozeshah Mehta and Surendranath Banerjee and these trio had deep impact on him in his early days of politics. He was hailed to be symbol of hindu-muslim unity and was architect of 1916 Lucknow Pact between the Congress and the League.

Jinnah resigned from congress in 1920 and in later part of movement demanded separate country for muslims. This was not before he attempted his 20 point formula which nehru and his team didnt accept. Rest as we say is history.

Jinnah is one of those figures which cannot be discussed without extreme emotional reactions. In India jinnah is person responsible for breaking nation into two.In pakistan jinnah is self less figure who became their savior. Truth lies some where in between but speaking about positives of jinnah can be suicidal as far as politics is concerned in India. Likewise speaking negative about jinnah can backfire in pakistan.

Almost all civil society people of pakistan agree that what jinnah envisioned about pakistan is totally different than what pakistan has become today. Same can be said about mahatma gandhi’s vision for India too..

Jinnah’s vision about pakistan was that of secular country, strong institutes and thriving democracy. Being Indian I dont want to say what pakistan has become since I can be said to be biased , it is for pakistanis to decide whether pakistan is what jinnah dreamt of?

I want to come to another point which Jinnah had made sitting in new Delhi while Pakistan had become certain reality. When he was asked about how he wants relation between India and Pakistan to be like?. He had replied that he wants relationship similar to neighbors Canada and USA.

Now usa and canada has not seen something like direct action day or bloody partition. Jinnah’s statement was more about hope than reality. But never the less it was positive statement.

Since jinnah made statement , India and Pakistan have had 3 wars , 1 mini war , two times on brink of war , un solved disputes , terrorism in India and many many trust deficit events.

Today as pakistan is facing challenges on many fronts and worst kind of natural calamity has hit pakistan , I remembered jinnah and his words about canada , usa. Today as India offered more aid and pakistan refused I wonder how far we have reached?. Instead of usa ,canada we have become more like south korea-north korea. Even taiwan wont have rejected chinese aid in times of calamity. Isn’t it?

I understand pakistanis might not like aid from India , I also believe that pakistan would come out of this challenge but it is irony that aid from country which is 16000 miles away is welcomed but from country which is 160 kms away is not accepted instantly…

Blame It On News Media!!!!!!!!

Saturday, July 17th, 2010

Yesterday was grand debate session in news channels. Grand because all had it . Topic was one of favorite topics , India -Pakistan talks. While Indian channels were angry over qureshi’s statement about s.m.krishna , there were many different options about why pakistan did what it did during talks , how press conference could have been handled in better way , what pakistan wants (according to individuals participating in debate). I am sure such debates might have taken place in pakistan news channels too.

While experts differed in most part of debate , most agreed on one part. News media’s role. Most agreed that press conference did played very important part in creating negativity in India-Pakistan talks which were recently held. Most had opinion that talks should be held away from media glare and media should be brought in only where negotitations have been reached.

Some experts believed that both India and Pakistan official play to galary through media and none wants to risk their political base and voters.

While this does have a valid point. News media plays very important role in evolving how we perceive about events which effect nation. If pakistan is listed in failed state , it does top headlines , if pakistan is listed in most unstable state , again that news finds place in headlines. But few report pakistan’s support for CWG games or India’s bid for non permanent member in security council. (Now critics would say it would oppose permanent seat. Well sure it would, would we support pakistan’s bid in present relationship status?).

Similarly in Pakistan’s daily , news about Kashmir or naxal would surely make headlines but India’s assistance in IMF loan to Pakistan?. Well it needed British foreign secretary to make that announcement. In one forum a pakistani was asked ‘what has gandhi done for them?’. Ironically gandhiji’s threat of fast unto death till India releases pakistan’s due during partition was find event which trigger nathuram godse’s decision to kill mahatma. This has been written by nathuram himself in his last letter. But pakistan media won’t print that!!!!!!!!. Similarly Indian media wont print positives of what pakistan does.

On other side of story news media is doing some wonderful things too. Geo tv and times of India’s aman ki asha is one of peace initiatives. Like wise ruchika , jessica , nitish kataria wont have seen justice if media won’t have created public pressure. Bhopal gas did spark outrage in civil society of India , courtesy news media.(It is different matter that daal , roti khao theme lets us forget things so easily)

So partial blame on news media about how pakistan perceives India and how India perceives Pakistan is valid but at same time without news media ,’hum sab chor hain’ theme would rule India and Pakistan without check.

Enhanced by Zemanta

India-Pakistan : Jab They Met

Friday, July 16th, 2010

India
Image via Wikipedia

They met because they were asked to meet. They discussed because they were asked to discuss. They listened to each other because they were given mandate to built trust. When S.M.Krishna went to meet Quershi , this “pakistan calling” episode was not for break throughs. It was for listening to where both countries stand and look for openings.

As both of them addressed press , differences in various issues was for every ones to see. From pillai to kashmir to Baluchistan , pakistan had many things to talk about while India had terrorism , trial of 26/11 , inflitration to discuss about.

As press asked question qureshi and krishna answered. They answered as if both of them were not in same press conference.
Nothing seemed common between two . While diplomats cried foul , at least the most positive aspect of press conference was honesty. Both foreign ministers honestly and frankly spoke about where they stand and what is their view point.

The most surprising statement as Indian for me was quershi’s comparision of Mr Pillai (Home secretary of India) with infamous

Hafiz Saeed , supremo of banned lashkar ae toyba and Jammat ud dawa. Now how can a rowdy element’s inflammatory speech compared with home secretary of any country?. Home secretary won’t utter a word without knowing what he is saying while people like saeed can create stories to get backing of illiterates to cause terror attacks in India.Hafiz saeed doesnot know that there are third largest number of muslims of the world  in India. He prefers to call India as hindus and it looks like he knows hindus more than hindus know themself.Hafiz has never stayed with hindus and has been mostly with muslims still he can write ‘why hindus are what they are’ encyclopedia. It is different matter that when JUD was banned , it’s website used hindu’s photo and write up about how JUD helped pakistani hindu families during earthquake. Using minority to avoid getting banned is famous trait of right wing groups all across the globe ,including India.

Coming back to qureshi , Never the less qureshi did think that a home secretary of India has equal weightage as hafiz saeed of pakistan!!!!!!!!. Now Indian press would take saeed’s statement more as official word!!!!!!!.

The hafiz saeed-Pillai saga did serve purpose of Indian press which was looking for some masala as well as opposition which cried foul and accused krishna of not standing by to home secretary.

If you replay the press conference you would come to know that krishna was half asleep when qureshi said famous words ‘both of us agreed that statement was uncalled for’. Before krishna could understand what he agreed with , press had another question and humhaar krishna did miss the bus.

Visit ended with no break throughs (nobody expected any though) but with ‘phir kab miloge , jab tum kahoge’ theme. Qureshi is expected to have ‘India calling’ theme , somewhere in November.

India and Pakistan are two countries whose relation can never make sense if third country/persons views it. Two nations separated since Independence. Two nations which often have two different versions for same event in history. Two nations which share genes , culture , most of food and to many extent destinies. India is land of more than 110 crore people while Pakistan has 18 crores. India is second most fasted economy in the world while pakistan is considered to be next big thing (if it gets is right) by world bank. India has highest number of poors (from 25% to 77% considering which report one sees) , while pakistan economy suffers because of bush’s stone age threat and taliban’s new found wisdom of making pakistan as per what they believe is Islam.

Both countries have exponential possibilities if both can get to work together and assist in creating peaceful environment.

Ordinary people of both countries though tagged as muslims , Indian muslims , Hindu , sikhs and many others , behind these tags and layers lies a emotional human being who wants to give best to his/her family , have good life and see his/her nation prosper. That is common ground where foreigner ministers can work upon.

No matter how much Indians and Pakistanis bash each other, fact remains that we need to be more realistic in our approach. We have had 3 wars , one mini war , has it solved issues?. India is facing terrorism since 20 years , did India give up kashmir?. India has been pressurizing pakistan for terrorism since last so many years , did that stop terrorism?. Pakistan has been trying to get kashmir issue solved since last 63 years , did it get solved?. So it is better to talk , talk and talk till we can achieve break throughs.

Should India keep talking while pakistan keeps shooting?. This question was asked to me by one of blog’s reader. Well valid point. Why do we keep talking when pakistan allows saeeds and salauddins to keep attacking India?. Ofcourse we need our concerns addressed. When pakistan says it is victim of terror , it is partially right. The full statement should be that pakistan is victim of terror mechanism which was created by ISI and CIA during soviet’s invasion of afghanistan. Where as India is victim of terror which was nurtured by previous regimes of pakistan and pakistan needs to deal with it. But at same time we need to engage with pakistan to get our concerns addressed.

To be fair with pakistan , they too have concerns and their own agendas. They have every right to have one. Without discussion we cannot have conducive environment to make sure things turn out positively for Indians and Pakistanis who would be born after 50 years.

P.S. : After this post was written Mr qureshi blamed India on selective approach and also questioned krishna’s mandate. 26/11 is very important issue for India and emotional issue for Indians. Life is not same after 26/11 and these concerns need to be addressed before others issues can be handled.

Enhanced by Zemanta