Archive for the ‘Terrorism In India’ Category

Saffron Terror, Chidambaram And Narendra Modi

Saturday, September 4th, 2010

Today My client called me at four p.m. to reschedule our meeting from 6 p.m. to 5 p.m. I confirmed the rescheduling and left my office at 4.30 pm. While I was driving through the traffic ,I saw a hoarding which picture of narendra modi. It read -’Kesari ae to tirango no aangh ,congress kaahe ae atankvaad no rang’ which means ’saffron is part of national flag,while congress calls it color of terrorism’.

As soon as chidambaram spoke those two words , BJP went on offensive. Generally two words found most offensive start dont start with s and t but these ones did. ‘Saffron Terror’. Considering how seasoned chidambaram is ,both in politics as well as in his law profession , he knew what he was speaking about and he knew what this words would directly,indirectly mean.

BJP , on other hand has right to attack because saffron is not just color of extremist outfits but also color of BJP flag (which has green too),RSS too and as that hoarding rightly said color present in our national flag too.

Saffron is not just limited to above three ,it is part of Indian culture. It is in flags of temple , it is color of sacrifice and it is color cherished by India since centuries. But did BJP get offended because of that?.Did chidambaram meant that when he occured those two words?

Answer in No. Chidambaram was not targeting general Indian masses .He was targeting fanatics in Hindus. Now if you ask any muslim about jihad and jihadi?. They would immediately react that jihad is part of Islam and obligatory on muslims but these so called jihadis are not part of Islam. Islam can do no harm to innocent is common belief shared by muslims all across the world which is perfectly understandable but it remains a fact that fanatics in muslims are cause of concerns for even muslim dominated countries like pakistan , afghanistan, Iraq , Sudan ,Somalia . According to those fanatics their version of Islam is true Islam and rest followers or believers have corrupted true belief system.

As muslims are usually in denial about these jihadi , Hindus are more or less equally in denial with possibility of fanatics in Hinduism. True Hinduism does not have single book which can be used for mis interpretation. True Hinduism believes that there are many ways to god . True Hinduism does not belief in conversion and Hinduism does not have strong belief in heaven and prefer moksha above heaven. A soul harming any innocent would get re birth and would be stuck in end less cycle of births is what Hinduism believes in but still that didn’t stop bombs getting exploded in places where investigation is leading towards fanatics among Hindus. It didn’t stop girls getting bashed outside manglore pub .

When we need to view fanatic , we need to look at larger view. We need to look humans beings as plain human beings not tagged as Hindus,Muslims ,Christians or other religious units…When we talk about Muslims or Hindus or Christians we aren’t talking about individuals but groups.Groups which are crores and fanaticm being human phenomena ,the bug can bite any one and fanaticm is based on ideology not religion only. Ideology that ‘my way is the only way, rest have to fall in line or perish’. Naxals are fanatics too though they don’t believe in any religion. Taliban are fanatics too , though they believe is radical Islam . Christianity has had its share of fanaticm and crusader is perfect example of that.

As human being we must nurture our coming generation in environment where co existence of various faith can exist together. We often blame pakistan but forget what pakistan is right now going through. All eminent scholars , media personnels and liberal of pakistan agree that pakistan is paying price of inducing extremism in their country , twenty years back.

If we dont learn from our neighbours , we too are heading their way.(by we I mean Indians which includes every person living in India irrespective of faith he/she follows). So chidambaram’s point must not get lost in color controversy. It does have important message in it.

Now coming back to color which chidambaram mentioned. Well he made sure his comments serves the purpose . Saffron terror can work for congress in getting votes from minority and liberals while saffron can very well mean bjp,rss instead of purohit and pragyas..It is like hitting two birds with one stone.

But if chidambaram can hit stone , narendra modi has always been successful in catching same stone and hitting it back. The hoarding says it all. Narendra Modi ,irrespective of extreme emotions he generates ,if one views him with prejudice , he is master is using any situation to best of his advantage. The more congress tries to gain political mileage by nailing right wing ,the more powerful modi would become in gujarat.

Modi and congress actually work to each others advantage. Being popular among their respective voters who fear/hate/worry about each other and it works. Saffron terror or Jihadi ..It works but amidst war of words , amidst emotions attached to saffron , we must not forget larger context and perceptive. India is liberal democracy and only thing which we need in India is implementing constitution in letter and spirit. Nailing fanatic muslims , fanatic sikhs , fanatic hindus and every person who can be threat to right of belief , freedom of expression and constitution of India.-Jai Hind

Islamic Terror, Saffron Terror & Chidambaram

Friday, August 27th, 2010

Shiv sena and BJP created uproar in rajyasabha yesterday reacting to comments by union home minister , Mr P Chidambaram. During police chief’s meet chidambaram had mentioned phenomena called ’saffron terror’. Shiv sena and BJP both objected to the word. While arun jaitley said that India has faced terrorism in punjab , kashmir and recently by maoist , never before government has linked it with religion or community. Paswan on other hand with his eyes of Bihar election and with goal of fooling Muslims again asked for banning vhp ,Rss and bajrang dal.

Considering shiv sena , bjp who count of hindutva card , congress which counts of secularism card and paswan who counts of Muslim and dalit card ,all four made sure that their respective votes banks remain intact!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I remember chidambaram in an interview to rajdeep sardesai had mentioned about ‘jihadis’ during 26/11 anniversary . His use of term ‘jihadi’ didnt go well with many Muslims which is understandable. One of them wrote letter to chidambaram and chidambaram apologized for using the term. To be fair with chidambaram his use of word ‘jihadi’ was not to hurt entire Muslim community. For those who are not Muslim this word is often associated with some one blowing himself/herself up in Pakistan or Afghanistan or Iraq, some one killing innocents in Somalia or bali or some one implanting bomb in newyork time square. People using jihad word are found all across the globe and are often associated with terrorism. So how would non Muslim regard this word?. To be fair with Muslims in population of billions even lakhs involving in terrorism does not represent rest billions of Muslims.

Coming to saffron terror , well 80 crore hindus cannot be linked with blast in mecca mashjid or similar blast. The same logic applicable to muslims works in this case too.How can home minister call some groups associated with terrorism as ’saffron terror’?.

Now looking into larger issue beyond tags of Muslims , Hindus , Sikhs or Christians. Larger issue is fanaticism. Ideology which believes that its way is only way. Most over religious person do adhere to this ideology. It does not create problem as long as it is not imposed on others but when imposition begins there lies the problem. Be it be Muslim fanatic believing that Islam should be imposed on all 700 crore people in the world or Hindu sanskruti custodian who bashes those who celebrate 14th feb. Both are similar in their thinking pattern and action. These are problems . Religion is personal matter and none would care what others worship or believe as long as one is allowed to live life as per one’s belief. That is how civilized society must function.

Middle ages when religion was used to have political gains have passed.unfortunately few have still remain frozen in times but positivity in the end would win over negative forces and the people belonging from various religion would have to take stand against fanatics . Let us stop tagging terrorism and deal it with firm resolve. Let us stop using religion for votes and maintain rule of law. Let us implement constitution in letter and spirit. Let us have only two communities , one which is tolerant and other which is fanatic ,needed to be crushed using law.

ITA’s Tribute To Real Heros of India On Occasion Of Independence Day

Monday, August 16th, 2010

As India celebrated its independence day , as expected various channels came in with different programs with flare of patriotism. While some followed rituals by showing movies based on patriotism , news channels had prime minister speech ,followed by specially designed programs to mark the occasion.
ITA had some unique way of celebrating independence day. It did have standard method of bringing celebrities from television performing on stage but at same time it awarded and acknowledge ,real stars of India. They awarded various people in social service category , fight against terrorism and education.
Fight against terrorism awardees were outstanding in their courage , commitment and love for country. Police officer from kashmir who was awarded is inspirational story because all odds were against her. Born in conservative muslim family , she due to her strong will and support from her family entered police force.The era when she entered police force was peak of
militancy . Since then she has been instrumental in fighting terrorist. Being kashmiri and working in police force is noteasy thing to do. She not only would have had to fight terrorist but also the separatist and pro freedom , pro pakistan forces in kashmir. Her courage is matchless and her life an inspiration.
Other people who were awarded are nursing staff of cama hospital. 26/11 was worst terror attack on India. Worst because of modus of operandi of terrorist. But it is said when negative forces attack , positive forces are always there who show courage , determination to defeat them. In hour of need , strong characters emerge from people itself and do something which
is super human effort. Nursing staff of cama hospital did exactly that. When cama hospital came under terror attack , they acted swiftly ,switching off the light , shifting patients and at same time making sure delivery of new borns take place smoothly. The nursing staff didn’t leave , they didnt run away , they stood as wall between terrorist and patients. Two gave
their lives in line of duty. They were not soldiers , they were not trained to defend , they were trained to heal but when time tested them , they should courage of soldiers. They are worth saluting .
Third ones to get award are irony of sorts. When 10 fanatics in name of so called jihad entered mumbai to kill as many as possible , three Indians and believer of religion which these fanatics claim to belief took a stand. Stand not to run away , stand to answer their duty. Duty towards fellow human being. When kasab along with other terrorist was firing in cst , khan
brothers were playing cricket in near by ground. Both heard noise of bullets. Both rushed to cst and saw people lying on floor. Some dead , some about to die while some injured. The two teens took them to hospital ,without caring about their lives. Saving as many as possible was their quest. Similar bravery was shown by chotu chai wala . He too carried people to
hospital.
In education category baabar ali got the award. Baabar ali is from west bengal and at age of 17 he is principal of a school !!!!!!!!. Baabar’s passion of education and making sure that maximum people get educated made him start teaching and today he has his own school where 100 kids get education.
Lastly the one who got award in social service category. She has been working in what can be said as actual India, that is rural India. She works for empowerment of women.

The above mentioned are real heros of India. I thank ITA for recognizing them.

Sohrabuddin & Amit Shah Saga : What is silver lining?

Sunday, July 25th, 2010

Amit shah is in news all across India. Modi’s man , ex home minister of gujarat who went missing , resigned and then re emerged has been sent to 14 day judicial custody. The big political news in which both congress and bjp made allegations and counter allegations using media as medium.

When majority of Indians were having holiday , Indian news media was having one of busiest days of the year. The re emerging amit shah had press conference before he went to cbi office. CBI which refused to give time to amit shah , surprisingly didnt take shah in their custody !!!!!!!!!!

As amit shah called this political encounter , congress slammed BJP stating that it is too later to cry foul since CBI was in scene since six months. BJP reacted that why amit shah was not arrested earlier if CBI has prove and questioned the timing. While BJP states that CBI is being misused , prime minister of India dismissed the charges outrightly.

BJP’s defense that sohrabuddin was terrorist with more weapons than kasab doesnot hold much grounds. Case is not about who sohrabuddin was. Even if one concedes that sohrabuddin was terrorist who was arms supplier , does it give right to police to over rule constitution , kidnap him and kill him. Is this how we want our country to function?. Do we want to become banana republic and operate like taliban or khaps do?

Sohrabuddin should have been arrested and case should have been conducted against it. I perfectly understand general feeling about our legal system. Cases go on and on and on. Witness turn hostile and quite often terrorist wait for their turn in mercy petition. Government plays various cards to safeguard their votes and in the end ‘aam aadmi’ feels vunerable , outraged and helpless.

Having said that we need to work on improving the system , rather then taking leaf out of taliban or unstable countries in how they would have reacted in such cases.

Coming to Amit Shah , he has every right to defend himself . The case would be argued in court and court would decide. It is neither for media or people or congress or bjp to decide whether amit shah is guilty or innocent.

As this much debated issue proceeds towards conclusion (one way or the other) , there is surely a silver lining in the case. Sohrabuddin is said to be notorious criminal who was also arms supplier. What ever he was , at least he was Indian citizen . When his brother wrote to supreme court , it accepted the letter as petition and directed CID of gujarat to look into the matter. CID booked 11 police officers , many IPS out of them and arrested them. Later case came to CBI.

The silver lining in the entire saga is supreme court . It gives faith to aam aadmi that who ever you are , what ever you are , supreme court is there. In highly corrupted system where politicians are same in every party , where faith on police force is less , judiciary still works to get matter investigated.

Amidst all allegations and counter allegations , amidst media buzzing with various news about saga , amidst congress using/misusing cbi , amidst BJP projecting itself as victim , amidst all news about sohrabuddin , one message stands tall. One message which gives hope , one message which proves that constitution works and that message for all aam aadmi is from supreme court , that it is there.

India-Pakistan : Jab They Met

Friday, July 16th, 2010

India
Image via Wikipedia

They met because they were asked to meet. They discussed because they were asked to discuss. They listened to each other because they were given mandate to built trust. When S.M.Krishna went to meet Quershi , this “pakistan calling” episode was not for break throughs. It was for listening to where both countries stand and look for openings.

As both of them addressed press , differences in various issues was for every ones to see. From pillai to kashmir to Baluchistan , pakistan had many things to talk about while India had terrorism , trial of 26/11 , inflitration to discuss about.

As press asked question qureshi and krishna answered. They answered as if both of them were not in same press conference.
Nothing seemed common between two . While diplomats cried foul , at least the most positive aspect of press conference was honesty. Both foreign ministers honestly and frankly spoke about where they stand and what is their view point.

The most surprising statement as Indian for me was quershi’s comparision of Mr Pillai (Home secretary of India) with infamous

Hafiz Saeed , supremo of banned lashkar ae toyba and Jammat ud dawa. Now how can a rowdy element’s inflammatory speech compared with home secretary of any country?. Home secretary won’t utter a word without knowing what he is saying while people like saeed can create stories to get backing of illiterates to cause terror attacks in India.Hafiz saeed doesnot know that there are third largest number of muslims of the world  in India. He prefers to call India as hindus and it looks like he knows hindus more than hindus know themself.Hafiz has never stayed with hindus and has been mostly with muslims still he can write ‘why hindus are what they are’ encyclopedia. It is different matter that when JUD was banned , it’s website used hindu’s photo and write up about how JUD helped pakistani hindu families during earthquake. Using minority to avoid getting banned is famous trait of right wing groups all across the globe ,including India.

Coming back to qureshi , Never the less qureshi did think that a home secretary of India has equal weightage as hafiz saeed of pakistan!!!!!!!!. Now Indian press would take saeed’s statement more as official word!!!!!!!.

The hafiz saeed-Pillai saga did serve purpose of Indian press which was looking for some masala as well as opposition which cried foul and accused krishna of not standing by to home secretary.

If you replay the press conference you would come to know that krishna was half asleep when qureshi said famous words ‘both of us agreed that statement was uncalled for’. Before krishna could understand what he agreed with , press had another question and humhaar krishna did miss the bus.

Visit ended with no break throughs (nobody expected any though) but with ‘phir kab miloge , jab tum kahoge’ theme. Qureshi is expected to have ‘India calling’ theme , somewhere in November.

India and Pakistan are two countries whose relation can never make sense if third country/persons views it. Two nations separated since Independence. Two nations which often have two different versions for same event in history. Two nations which share genes , culture , most of food and to many extent destinies. India is land of more than 110 crore people while Pakistan has 18 crores. India is second most fasted economy in the world while pakistan is considered to be next big thing (if it gets is right) by world bank. India has highest number of poors (from 25% to 77% considering which report one sees) , while pakistan economy suffers because of bush’s stone age threat and taliban’s new found wisdom of making pakistan as per what they believe is Islam.

Both countries have exponential possibilities if both can get to work together and assist in creating peaceful environment.

Ordinary people of both countries though tagged as muslims , Indian muslims , Hindu , sikhs and many others , behind these tags and layers lies a emotional human being who wants to give best to his/her family , have good life and see his/her nation prosper. That is common ground where foreigner ministers can work upon.

No matter how much Indians and Pakistanis bash each other, fact remains that we need to be more realistic in our approach. We have had 3 wars , one mini war , has it solved issues?. India is facing terrorism since 20 years , did India give up kashmir?. India has been pressurizing pakistan for terrorism since last so many years , did that stop terrorism?. Pakistan has been trying to get kashmir issue solved since last 63 years , did it get solved?. So it is better to talk , talk and talk till we can achieve break throughs.

Should India keep talking while pakistan keeps shooting?. This question was asked to me by one of blog’s reader. Well valid point. Why do we keep talking when pakistan allows saeeds and salauddins to keep attacking India?. Ofcourse we need our concerns addressed. When pakistan says it is victim of terror , it is partially right. The full statement should be that pakistan is victim of terror mechanism which was created by ISI and CIA during soviet’s invasion of afghanistan. Where as India is victim of terror which was nurtured by previous regimes of pakistan and pakistan needs to deal with it. But at same time we need to engage with pakistan to get our concerns addressed.

To be fair with pakistan , they too have concerns and their own agendas. They have every right to have one. Without discussion we cannot have conducive environment to make sure things turn out positively for Indians and Pakistanis who would be born after 50 years.

P.S. : After this post was written Mr qureshi blamed India on selective approach and also questioned krishna’s mandate. 26/11 is very important issue for India and emotional issue for Indians. Life is not same after 26/11 and these concerns need to be addressed before others issues can be handled.

Enhanced by Zemanta